Good Morning, American Society for Nutrition

June 8th: My suitcase wheels leave parallel trails of sand across the granite floor of the Boston Sheraton Hotel. The Smiling Coast of Africa sits 3,858 miles behind me. The inaugural ASN meeting awaits. I consume a lemon twist muffin in two bites. Good Morning, America.

Carrying spinach quiche and chocolate croissants, Nutrition 2018 attendees flock from corner cafes, hotel buffets, and caffeine collectives.  Someone probably enjoys a carb-less commute. We unite in the name of science. I open my Nutrition 2018 app: ‘Emotion Trumps Science. Why Science-based Facts are No Longer Enough to Educate the Public Effectively.’ I adjust my badge and gulp the last swig of cream-filled coffee. My blood sugar soars with glee. I steer towards the 3rd floor escalator.

As the world’s premiere nutrition society, Nutrition 2018 delivered an extensive nutrition experience. The greatest minds in nutrition science surrendered novel findings, shared the latest technologies, and strengthened existing partnerships. The exhaustive list of research themes made it impossible for patrons to attend every event. Here, I proffer one personal, fragmented, undeniably biased account of the proceedings:

The Hynes Convention Center fills with the familiar buzz of old friends, new members, and seasoned colleagues.  We navigate the sea of posters, search for friendly faces, and scurry up and down the stairs searching for the next symposium. While waiting outside the overflowing microbiome theater room, I overhear colleagues’ questions:

Do we promote muscadine grape extract, curcumin shots, supplement with flavonol-rich cocoa—or all three? We must finally decide on low calorie sweeteners. What is the best way to measure infant cognitive performance? How much longer must the nefarious GMO lurk in antipathy? What are the constraints and challenges in vegetable production (and distribution)? We discuss the success stories of various sectors.

Eating Behavior and Brain Function

June 9th: Cascades of cheese beckoned from the second floor corridor. I had traveled across the sea from a small West African village called Keneba, where I was incidentally engaged in a two-week fasting experiment. The Ramadan fast is a month-long, annual ritual involving prayer, empathy, abstaining from smoking and gossiping, curbing negative thoughts and anger, etc. How quickly I pile my plate with pita bread and drizzle the salad with a symphony of sauces.

It all goes back to an elementary principle my instructor wisely professed: everything in moderation. Easier said than done.

We continue to detect and characterize eating behavior, but numerous factors guide food and beverage choices. Somehow, we must muster some magic and change the way humans think. How in the world can we alter the behavior of such irrational creatures?

If repeated behaviors alter brain function, how long does it take to subsequently rewire those circuits? (The answer is certainly more than a two-week, well-intentioned Ramadan fast.) A recent study investigated whether prolonged fasting or weight loss influenced neural activity in obese participants and found that an 8-week weight loss intervention (but not a 48-hour fast), decreased activity in brain areas involved in feeding behavior and reward processing (1).

Nutrition and Nutrition Programs for School-Age Children

June 10th: At the front of the lunch line I peer across the ticket counter. Finished? “ASN is out of small sandwiches,” I whisper dismally.

Some of us know all too well the effects of a lackluster lunch. Many advocate for SNAP and other strategies within the United States. Around the world, stunting and childhood growth issues continue to puzzle scientists. How can we help children at risk for stunting grow taller? Wide gaps in the evidence for program effectiveness remain. Exposure to a comprehensive nutrition program among infants under 2 years old in Malawi led to a small but sustained increase in weight but not linear growth during the preschool-age period (2). Perhaps we will see intergenerational benefits of India’s national mid-day meal program— now in its third decade of implementation—but what is our next move (3)? Providing calories and vitamins alone probably won’t do.

Perhaps our programs are too late. What must an expectant mother eat to ensure her future child’s epigenome stays error-free? So far, little evidence indicates that the initiation of a comprehensive nutrition supplement during the preconception period prompts superior birth outcomes over initiation at the 1st and 2nd trimesters (4). However, maternal choline supplementation during pregnancy recently showed improvements in executive functioning in children at age 7 (5).

While global health experts consider blanket Vitamin-A supplementation and the prevalence of seasonal orange-palmed Zambian children (6), others discuss food matrix complexities, enteropathy, and protein needs. Much effort in international research is directed towards ending acute malnutrition and stunting (7). Understanding which ingredients might bolster resistance against infection, fight cancer, and curb HIV is still a great challenge.

Personalized Nutrition

June 11th: 3,500 scientists, clinicians, policy experts, 2018 Fellows, enamored students, emerging leaders, and placid professors unite as equals, once again, in the quest for finger foods.

To end the ASN Nutrition 2018 conference, we renew our commitment to food. Food remains timeless. The early fetus, picky adolescent, pregnant woman, professional athlete, and spindly senior must partake. However, one size does not fit all. We are moving fast towards diet profiling, setting the table for personally prescribed food provisions. Matching macronutrient composition and fiber content to an individual’s specific glucose metabolism and microbial makeup may improve weight loss outcomes and help some achieve optimum health (8).

Still, the evidence for fruit and vegetable consumption prevails. Dietary intakes of total flavonols and its more common subclasses might slow cognitive decline in aging adults (9). New links are being made between flavonoids, endothelial function, and vascular health (10). Other aspects of health are difficult to pick apart. The role of fruits and vegetables in psychological well-being is evident (11), but we must isolate it from other confounding factors. May the awe-inspiring intricacies of phytonutrients be realized forevermore?

“Good” and “Bad” Food Choices and Timely Interventions

June 12th: I promptly visit Trader Joe’s to pack my carry-on bag with exclusive, superior plane snacks. Armed with tomatillo salsa and olive tapenade, I lug my suitcase through Newark International Airport. Just thirty minutes after takeoff, the temptation is too great. My inability to refuse salty airplane pretzels must be related to a genetic polymorphism.

SNP or no SNP, I am a trained nutrition expert. Like so many Americans, I know what’s “good” and “bad,” yet I continue to make “bad” choices. Solve that scientific mystery!

If we begin at the earliest life stages, the American Heart Association recommends that children under 2-years avoid added sugar. A recent analysis of NHANES data showed that more than 80% of 6- to 23-month-olds consumed on average 4.2 teaspoons of added sugar (12). Timely interventions seem worthwhile. Repeated exposure can increase infants’ acceptance of initially disliked foods (e.g., dark leafy greens), but caregivers report lacking the persistence that is necessary to achieve acceptance (13).

Some innovative programs targeting adolescents have made great progress: cooking experience and family involvement was found to alter BMI in 4th graders (14); but can knowledge alone safeguard the child who ogles delicious discount chocolate bars at the checkout counter every afternoon?

Becoming Conscious Consumers

To test my metabolic flexibility, consumption continues in the Frankfurt airport terminal. I walk past ice cream cones and duty free Toblerone, but stop to savor the seed-covered, crusty, thick brick of dark brown bread. My subcortical neural networks (involved in homeostatic cognitive control and reward processing) jump for joy.

Americans are ravenous for the wrong things. Instead of being world-renowned for childhood obesity and portion sizes, let us strive to be known for our transformative innovations that precipitate a radical shift in our population’s health and happiness.

The war on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is being waged worldwide. High SSB consumption at 5-years is associated with higher BMI and risk of being overweight. However, if we are to modify our sugary beverage consumption, we must present alternative drinks as well as quantified directives (15). This is just one facet of the potbellied problem.

We need both blanket and tailored interventions to help us make better choices. Interventions focused on reducing bites, reducing eating rate, and taking more steps may be practical for those who are more prone to eating in response to external cues that are independent of internal hunger and satiety (16).

We shall not become supplement fairies and place omega-3’s under children’s pillows at night. We shall not wait for the blueberry crumble miracle pill, devoid of caloric content and formulated for our metabolic needs. We must engage the public and empower people to act. Somehow, we will start listening to what our bodies truly need, becoming more conscious and respectful consumers.

Dietary Behavior Tools, Systems, and Prevention Strategies

I board again in Brussels, Belgium. Surely, I do not have to explain irrational excitement over airplane food to you, nutrition scientist, or the pure thrill of peeling back the foil to reveal… surprisingly nice marinara raviolis, questionable coleslaw, and the obligatory bread roll. I am sandwiched between two tall Senegalese men still stifling Ramadan hunger pangs; they neatly pack away their lunches.

There is no feedback pathway that tells the body to absorb less when it consumes too much (the changes must come from deep within!). Online dietary behavior change tools can only reduce gestational weight gain if the pregnant population uses them (17). Whether it’s a food revolution or a shift in focus, we must (wince) make America healthy again.

What are the consequences if we don’t?

Digital imaging innovations promise to measure consumption, household purchases, and even food environments with increased accuracy (18, 19). Mobile and electronic-supported health care (eHealth and mHealth) will surely play a role in weight and eating interventions (20). Will insurance packages soon include dietetic nutrition counseling?

We must think about systems. We must share prevention strategies. We must reach more people—in school lunchrooms, household pantries, drive-through windows, and picnic baskets.

Inevitably, someone must also translate this science for every person who eats. We have orthorexia, anorexia, anemia, aflatoxin exposure, unauthorized cardiac events, and unwarranted childhood obesity. Our solutions must reflect the inequalities that exist.

American Society for Nutrition’s Role in Improving Health Through Nutrition

June 14th: Gambian sand resettles between my toes. The coastal air seeps into my skin. Piles of freshly fallen mangos greet me on the ground. I peel back the green membrane and sink my teeth into juicy, orange flesh. Good morning, Gambia.

However, I have also returned to a crisis of the worst kind. The Fula bakers are on strike. Breadmakers demand 7 dalasis (15 cents) for tapalapa (thick, delicious baguette made of unfortified white flour), but buyers refuse to pay more than the customary 6.

I buy breakfast beneath the baobab tree for 5 dalasis (10 cents), thicken it with milk powder, add peanut paste, and swirl in honey for a rich, energy-dense and delicious breakfast. Though this meal will likely improve my appetite, satiety levels, and snacking behaviors throughout the day, not many in the village would dare pay such a price for a protein punch.

At six o’clock, I mount my bicycle for the routine ride to Manduar. “Water is coming!” a Gambian boy exclaims as I quickly pedal past his field. Farmers look nervously and expectantly into the sky. Rural villages lack the abundance of markets, restaurants, and imported packaged foods available at the coast. The brief annual rains must yield enough groundnuts and maize to provide food for families until the following harvest.

Improvements in nutrition and agriculture will plot a different development trajectory for all countries. Global food insecurity remains a growing problem. Diet diversity is grim, both in America and worldwide. Americans value convenience: we stock our freezers full of microwave meals. Gambians enjoy meals largely limited to rice, heavily laden with oil and virtually void of vegetables.

We are the American Society for Nutrition. America is guilty of self-destructive food behaviors—learned, practiced, and engrained cultural habits that we must amend. This transformation has already begun. In 2028 we will celebrate our centenary; the ASN vision is due to expand. America maintains the ability to lead other countries, to stir momentum for a global movement of improved health through good nutrition. Unfinished business identified, we can position our society to serve the public and the world at large. As a society—embracing our role, responsibilities, and reach—we must continue to examine and explore these issues one bite at a time.

References

  1. A.van Opstal, Wijngaarden, Marjolein, Pijl, Hanno, van der Grond, Jeroen, Changes in brain activity after weight loss in obesity, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. K. Hurley, Exposure to comprehensive nutrition program among children 6-23m of age in Malawi led to sustained increase in weight but not linear growth during the preschool-age period, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. S. Scott, Intergenerational Benefits of India’s National School Feeding Program: Identifying a Path to Reduced Child Stunting in the Next Generation, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. N. Krebs, Impact of a preconception maternal nutrition intervention on birth length in 4 low middle income countries: the “Women First” trial, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. C. Bahnfleth, Enduring benefits of prenatal choline supplementation in 7-year olds: enhanced attention task performance, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. S. Tanumihardjo, Children: Biofortification of food and possiblevitaminA toxicity, Friday June 8, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. L. Larson, Meta-analysis of the Effects of Various Types of Early Life Interventions on Linear Growth vs. Neurodevelopment, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. A. Astrup, Personalized dietary management of obesity based on simple biomarkers, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

 

  1. T. Holland, Dietary Intake of Flavonols May Slow Decline in Multiple Cognitive Abilities, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. S. Johnson, Flavonoid-rich Foods for Attenuating VascularEndothelial Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Risk with Aging, Saturday June 9, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. L. Jahns, The Role of Vegetables and Fruits in Psychological Well-Being, Monday June 11, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. K. Herrick, Consumption of added sugars among U.S. infants aged 6-23 months, 2011-2014, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. K. Moding, The Good Tastes Study: exploring caregiver feeding persistence and the roles of perceived infant liking, child temperament, and caregiver food neophobia, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. B. Lohse, Cooking experience and family involvement key to BMI change in a 4th grade school-based intervention, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.
  2. V. Malik, Principles for Establishing a Guidance System forBeverage Consumption, Saturday June 9, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. J. Beatty, Examining Weight-Related Eating Behaviors within an 8-Week Weight Loss Intervention, Saturday, June 9, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. C. Olson, Use of an online dietary behavior change tool: associations with reduced risk of excessive gestational weight gain, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. E. Shonkoff, Reliability and validity of digital images to assess plate waste in a restaurant setting, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. D. Brassard, Examining the Value of Using Multiple Web-Based Dietary Assessment Instruments to Measure Population Dietary Intake – The PREDISE Study, Sunday June 10, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

 

  1. J. G. Thomas, The Role of Technology in the Delivery of Behavioral Interventions, Saturday June 9, American Society for Nutrition 2018.

What do I eat? That is a question most people ask themselves at least once a day. Imagine getting a prescription from your physician and vetted by a nutritionist to cook certain foods at home. The prescription is tailored to your personal needs, and your care team has received training as health coaches to help you successfully implement this new plan. This is culinary medicine.

Read more

Which consumer are you?

The astute academic or health professional: You have a degree (one or more) in nutrition, you have PubMed bookmarked on your internet browser, and you spend your days dispelling nutrition myths and/or researching the next nutrition breakthrough.

The health foodie. You scour wholesome recipes online, you already know the nutrition trends for 2019, you make detailed grocery lists like it’s your job, you’re a #mealprepsunday veteran, and always know where to find the best deals for natural/organic/raw/fresh eats.

The bachelor/broke student: Is it cheap? Edible? Delicious? Easy to prepare? If yes, it goes in the cart.

The athlete with phenomenal sport skills, and (developing) culinary know-how: You know that the foods you eat influence your athletic performance. You are game for eating better, under one condition: you need quick/easy foods that pack a nutritional punch.

The busy parent: There are lunches to make, picky eaters to feed, and you can’t remember the last time you enjoyed a calm, healthy mealtime at home. Grocery shopping is typically a stressful battle between your healthy intentions, and the little ones’ demands for sugary cereals and flashy marketing.

Photo Credit: Lifehacker

Whether you identify with one or multiple distinct categories listed here, each one is unified by a few common underlying themes:

We all eat.

We crave amazing flavors.

There are never enough hours in the day.

We really do have good intentions; We want to eat well.

Assuming we don’t grow/hunt/gather our own food, we cross paths with one another for a common purpose: Food Shopping! On that note, we’ve been exposed to the same rules of thumb for healthy grocery shopping:

-Shop the perimeter!

-Steer clear of the middle aisles!

The way I see it, there are two types of people in this world: Those who love the center aisles (but could use a little strategy for picking the best options), and those who openly shun those aisles (but are secretly curious to explore the forbidden foods within).

As a health professional, it’s my duty to pass along this tried-and-true advice. But as a real-life RD on a budget, I hear you: Those middle aisles are mighty tempting, so what’s a guy/girl to do?

Take a deep breath, direct that grocery cart towards those center aisles, keep your eye on the prize and walk with intention because you have a fool-proof plan. Healthy shoppers, unite! Today, you’ll conquer those middle aisles like the savvy consumer you are.

Photo Credit: The Sports Nutrition Coach

Your strategy: Divide and conquer by food group like so:

Whole grains, legumes, and pseudograins: Instant oatmeal, frozen brown rice or quinoa (that’s a pseudograin), ready-to-serve plain cooked rice, Grape Nuts (for impressive iron and fiber content), popcorn, Vaccuum packed pre-cooked lentils (that’s a legume), whole grain bread (can you find bread with 0-1g sugar per serving? Can you find fiber above 2g per serving?)

Fruits and vegetables: Frozen is your friend! These items are picked at peak ripeness and flash-frozen immediately afterwards. Canned items are fine as well (in light syrup or water). Can you get all colors of the rainbow?

Protein: Canned beans, canned tuna, canned chicken, canned salmon, frozen chicken strips (no breading), hummus

Dairy: single serve plain Greek yogurt (Ok, you’ll find this in the perishables, but this is too versatile not to include), string cheese

Fats: Olives, frozen Cool Whip, prepared guacamole

Snacks: Dark chocolate (Pro-tip: Pick one with single-digit grams sugar per serving), nuts (try pistachios, almonds, or walnuts), dried fruit, jerky, whole grain chips, hummus

Drinks: Chocolate milk

Spreads/flavorings: Sriracha, olive oil, balsamic vinegar, mustard, pesto

Photo credit: Smile Sandwich

 Once you return home from this über successful grocery trip, you’ll want to assemble some stellar meals using your new bounty. Try this one-day sample plan:

Breakfast: Yogurt cup topped with frozen fruit, Grape Nuts, nut butter (purchase single serve packets in a pinch!) Feeling extra hungry? Prepare a side of instant oatmeal

Lunch: Tuna sandwich (canned tuna mixed w/ mustard, Ezekiel bread). Side of green salad (found in deli section)

Snack: Handful of nuts, handful chips, and hummus

Post Workout: Classic PB&J, or chocolate milk

Dinner: Defrost that frozen rice, quinoa, or lentils, frozen veggies of choice, top w/ beans (and/or thawed ready-to-eat chicken), salsa, pre-made guacamole, and Sriracha

Dessert: 2-3 squares of dark chocolate, alongside frozen blueberries w/ a dollop of cream

Not everyone has a nutrition coach by their side, but you, ASN reader, have an edge. Use this guide to confidently navigate the previously forbidden center aisles. Print it, internalize it, share it. No nonsense, no gimmicks. Blasphemy? Hardly. Creative and backed in science? Absolutely.

Nutrition 2018 is fast approaching and apart from diverse didactic programming, they will also be offering Connect with the Fed – one-on-one sessions to help students, early career, and established researchers get questions and concerns addressed regarding grant funding. Connect with the Fed will take place on Sunday, June 10th and Monday, June 11th from noon-3:00 PM in a designated area of The Hub – look for it in on the exposition floor, and sign up for an appointment there.

Read more

With more than 20 featured sessions, 2,000 presentations of new, original research, 5 award lectures, numerous workshops and non-stop networking opportunities, we think it’s safe to say that there is something for everyone at Nutrition 2018.

Be sure to check out the Nutrition 2018 Schedule Planner before you go.  This interactive, online platform will help you navigate all of Nutrition 2018’s offerings.  Click here for tips on planning your conference experience to get the most out of Nutrition 2018.

Here’s a preview of just a few of the offerings you will find in Boston:

Scientific and Statistical Principles, A Workshop based on the Best (but Oft-Forgotten) Practices Article Series in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Saturday, 1:00 – 3:00 PM

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition has published a series of articles to help reinforce important scientific and statistical principles that should be useful for researchers in general and for those in nutrition in particular. The conduct and analysis of scientific endeavors are constantly changing, and much like there is continuing medical education, the AJCN editors intend for this series to serve in a way as “continuing scientific education.”  Join Associate Editor David Allison, PhD and Editor-in-Chief Dennis Bier, MD for a refresher course on topics related to statistical design and analysis.

Nutrition and Natural Disasters, a featured presentation in the Japan Society of Nutrition and Food Science Forum
Saturday, 1:30 – 3:00 PM

From major earthquakes to tsunamis, Japan has endured its share of catastrophic natural disasters.  Nobuyo Kasaoka, PhD, RD, will discuss how Japan addresses nutrition challenges following natural disasters.

Ensuring Trust in Nutrition Science
Saturday, 1:30 – 3:00 PM  AND Monday, 1:00 PM  (ASN Live! in The Hub)

ASN commissioned a Blue Ribbon Panel on “Ensuring Trust in Nutrition Science” to develop best practices regarding how to work collaboratively with various stakeholders across sectors and disciplines while maintaining transparency and scientific rigor in nutrition science to uphold the trust of all stakeholders.  Join panel member, Patrick Stover, PhD, to learn more about the recommendations coming out of this effort.

Is a Calorie a Calorie:  Reframing the Question
Sunday, 8:00 – 10:00 AM

Does obesity result from consuming more calories than you burn or might the body’s hormonal and metabolic regulation systems also play a role?  What are the right research questions we should be asking to advance our understanding of this topic? Esteemed researchers share their views and advance the discussion on this long-debated topic.

NIH CSR Grant Review
Sunday, 12:15 – 12:45 PM at Science Stage in The Hub

Interested in learning more and becoming involved with the NIH grant review process?  Join Fungai Chanetsa, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review Officer for NIH’s Center for Scientific Review for an interactive discussion. Dr. Chanestsa will also highlight the Early Stage Career Reviewer Program.

 How Can Dietary Assessment be Improved?  Budding Entrepreneurs Propose New Ideas in Sight and Life’s Elevator Pitch Contest
Sunday, 3:00 – 5:00 PM

Seven finalists from around the world will pitch their ideas for new technologies and methods to improve the measurement of dietary intake. Paired with mentors from the Harvard School of Business, these young professionals aim to impress an esteemed panel of judges for a cash prize. Sit back and enjoy Nutrition 2018’s version of Shark Tank.

Altmetrics:  Real Time Measurement of Your Scholarly Impact
Sunday, 3:00 – 4:00 PM and Monday, 10:30 – 11:30 AM

Online tools allow researchers to broaden the impact of their published work in an ever increasing way.  What are alternative metrics, when should you use them and why should you care?  Join us for this workshop to learn about the major trends in the development of new metrics to measure the impact of your publications.

Recent Advances in Nutritional Modulation of the Immune System
Monday, 8:00 – 10:00 AM

Recent years have brought a new understanding of the role of the immune system in health and disease.  In this session, researchers will present intriguing new findings suggesting how foods, nutrients and conditions such as obesity interact with the immune system and inflammation.

New Technologies in the Food System:  How Do they Fit and Who Decides?  (Food Evolution Movie Screening and Discussion)
Monday, 10:30 AM – 12:30 PM

What are the decision-making processes that bring changes to the food system? What is the role of government, consumers, producers and scientists in these discussions? How do new technologies such as GMOs fit into the hierarchy of needs for the food system?  Join us for a viewing of the Food Evolution movie followed by a panel discussion moderated by The Washington Post’s Tamar Haspel.

Nutrition and Health in an Accelerating Pace of Life
Tuesday, 8:00 – 10:00 AM

There is no single metric to quantify the pace of life, but many indices indicate that it is fast and accelerating nationally and globally.  Since World War II, there has been an increasing demand for a food supply that is not only safe, palatable, and affordable, but also convenient. This has been driven to a large extent by substantive shifts in where people live, the types of jobs they have, the increasing hours worked, dual-income families, food preparation methods and other behaviors. This has all driven the desire for, indeed the necessity of, options that emphasize convenience. The consequence of this for food availability and choice, nutrient composition and health are still largely unknown, but widely speculated upon.  Consumer expectations and claims by some clinicians and policy makers have far outpaced the science leading to confusion and increased risk of poor food choices.  The magnitude and duration of this shift in ingestive behaviors elevates it beyond a “fad” to a reality that must be better understood. This session will explore the historic, current and future consequences of changing lifestyles on diet quality and health.

Tasting Outside the Oral Cavity
Monday, 10:30 AM – 12:30 PM

Recent evidence documents the presence of taste receptors throughout the GI tract as well as in many other peripheral sites. The nature of these receptors and the ligands they bind are often the same as those in the oral cavity. These discoveries raise new questions with important health implications. To what extent is there a continuity of sensory and nutrient information flowing from the oral cavity through the extent of the GI tract and what are the implications of activating or disrupting this information flow?  Are compounds once thought to be biologically inert in the GI tract actually modulating processes such as digestion, appetite and nutrient absorption? This session will review the evidence for extra oral “taste” sensing and its potential health implications.  Evidence from cell culture, animal models and human trials will be presented.

Prevention of Food Allergies & Atopic Disease: The Atopic March – Can it Be Halted?
Tuesday, 10:30 AM – 12:30 PM

Food allergy occurs in up to 12% of American children and adults, and as many as 5% of infants have eczema. Rates of food allergy have been steadily increasing over the past 2 decades.  Past infant feeding guidelines have emphasized breastfeeding, delaying the introduction of complementary foods, and extended delay in exposure of the most allergenic foods such as peanuts, eggs, fish, soy and wheat.  On the basis of randomized controlled trials, these guidelines have recently been revised to recommend early exposure to allergens. Controversy remains regarding potential protective effects of hydrolyzed formulas (are they as hypoallergenic as breast milk?); optimal timing of introduction, especially in relation to recommendations for exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months; and potential benefit of breastfeeding at time of introduction of peanut, gluten, egg.  Also, who should be targeted for these recommendations?   Those deemed high risk or the general population?

To attend these sessions, please click here to register for Nutrition 2018!

 

Conversations about nutrition and health are now common in the media and in the lives of many consumers, as they become increasingly aware of and interested in the health benefits of certain foods and food components. However, not everyone understands how to evaluate the nutrition information they come across to determine which information is fact versus fiction. To help the public better understand and evaluate hot topics in nutrition science, the American Society for Nutrition (ASN) launched a video competition in 2018, Understanding Nutritional Science, inviting student and early-career members to submit short videos to illustrate nutrition fact versus fiction.

ASN is pleased to now announce the winning entry! Samuel Walker, Angela Tacinelli, and Aubree Worden Hawley, all graduate students at the University of Arkansas Department of Food Science, created the first-place video, “#Facts vs. Fiction”. You can view the video online here!

The under two-minute video encourages viewers to scientifically evaluate nutrition information and provides tips to help consumers determine if nutrition-related news is fact or fiction. Some of those tips include: Read beyond the title of a nutrition-related article, and make sure there are valid references; Trust nutrition information from licensed professionals, and Consider the domain where information is coming from, such as .edu or .gov. The winning students all received free registration to attend Nutrition 2018. Make plans to meet them during Nutrition 2018 and view their winning video in ASN Live! on Saturday, June 9th at 7:30PM.

 

March is National Nutrition Month. The campaign promotes healthy eating habits and nutrition education, and it celebrates the people who promote these healthy habits. In 2018, the theme is “Go Further with Food”, highlighting that food decisions make an impact on your overall health.

Members of the American Society for Nutrition (ASN) are diverse. We study nutrition as a science, reporting on the physiological and biological aspects of foods and nutrients. We are also the nutrition educators and practitioners who get the latest nutrition science into the hands of those who need it: policymakers, dietitians, medical doctors, nurses and allied health professionals, and consumers. To celebrate National Nutrition Month and ASN’s impact on enhancing the knowledge of nutrition and quality of life, we will be highlighting some of our programs and activities that ultimately influence public health and how we can “go further with food.”

NUTRITION 2018 – American Society for Nutrition’s Annual Meeting

Nutrition 2018 LogoThis year ASN kicks off a new annual meeting that will focus on the multidisciplinary field of nutrition science. The meeting will bring together basic, translational, clinical, and population scientists and practitioners. The meeting will be held in Boston June 9-12 and registration is open now!

Some hot nutrition topics at the meeting:

  • Role of Anti-inflammatory Nutrition Strategies
  • Pediatric Nutrition
  • Nutrition and the Environment
  • Precision Nutrition
  • Science of Breastfeeding
  • Food Allergies

These are only a few topics that are included in the 4-day nutrition meeting. Our NUTRITION 2018 schedule is now open so please refer to it for the latest sessions.

Stay tuned for more news and a special membership offer for dietitians and nutritionists during National Nutrition Month.

One of the best feelings is when you get a good night’s sleep and feel refreshed to take on the day. Unfortunately, many of us (especially us graduate students) stay up too late and wake up too early, which leads to not enough sleep and/or poor sleep quality. However, getting enough sleep may be an important health habit to prioritize since research has suggested there is a link between sleep and nutrition.

Recently, a study that found a negative correlation between sleep and sugar consumption has been getting a lot of media attention. In this study, researchers from King’s College London recruited 42 healthy participants who reported frequently sleeping less than 7 hours of sleep per night. At baseline, participants were given a wrist actigraph to objectively measure sleep and were asked to record their sleep and wake times in 7-day sleep diaries, along with their food intake.

After baseline assessments, participants were randomly assigned with stratification to the sleep extension group (n = 21) or the control group (n = 21). Participants in the sleep extension group were given a personalized sleep consultation session with the purpose of encouraging participants to increase time in bed by about 1-1.5 hours each night. The control maintained their usual habits.

After one month, researchers found that the sleep extension group increased their time in bed by 55 minutes, sleep period by 47 minutes, and sleep duration by 21 minutes, on average. These increases led the sleep extension group to meet a weekly average sleep duration of the recommended 7-9 hours. These increases in sleep were not observed in the control group. However, participants in the sleep extension group reported a decline in sleep quality. The researchers speculated this might have been due to the adjustment period of spending more time in bed. Participants in the sleep extension group also self-reported lower sugar consumption, which was significantly different from the control group. There was a trend towards a decrease in carbohydrate and fat intake in the sleep extension group as compared to the control group, but this was not significantly different. The researchers found no difference in cardiometabolic risk factors or appetite hormones between the groups from pre- to post-.

These results demonstrate that sleeping longer could be associated with consuming less sugar. However, this study had several limitations, such as using a small sample of predominantly white females and relying on self-reported food records. More research needs to be done in this area using larger randomized controlled trials over a longer duration. For now, the current sleep recommendations are to aim for 7-9 hours of sleep a night.

 

Reference:

  1. Al-Khatib HK, Hall WL, Creedon A, et al. Sleep extension is a feasible lifestyle intervention in free-living adults who are habitually short sleepers: a potential strategy for decreasing intake of free sugars? A randomized controlled pilot study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;0:1–11. doi:1093/ajcn/nqx030

By: Rebecca Scritchfield, RD, ACSM Health Fitness Specialist
ASN Blogger at EB 2010

If you’re a nutrition scientist, you know you need to get published. Well, I’ve got your crib sheet on how to boost your chances of seeing your name in print (or online).

Presenting… the top 5 tips for getting accepted into ASN Journals by none other than the editors themselves.

Here’s what you need to do:

1. Make sure your work is right for AJCN or JN. About 25% of papers are returned simply because they aren’t a good fit for the publications. For example, a food science paper is not really going to get in a publication that is more clinical.

2. You have to be timely. You cannot afford to let your work get old. Do the work. Have something to say and get to writing. Old data is not newsworthy, and your chances of getting published are greatly diminished. Don’t let yourself procrastinate the writing. Get your rough ideas down in a rough flow. You may find that it is easier to get your tables and data down first because you can visualize the rest more easily.

3. Ask the right question. You have to have a strong research question. Be relevant and significant. The research question is the foundation of the study. You can’t possibly have a study worthy of publishing with a poor research question.

4. Be realistic in your inferences. No matter how much you love your work and believe in its potential, don’t make a “passionate” inference or even conclude something you really can’t justify. Avoid exuberance at all costs.

5. Admit when you aren’t perfect. You need to make sure you acknowledge flaws in the methodology. This is so important for readers to understand the strengths and weaknesses of your work. This information is crucial for development of future studies as well.

Good luck… and have fun!

Rebecca Scritchfield is a Washington, D.C. based registered dietitian in private practice specializing in healthy weight management. She is a member of ASN and is covering several events at EB 2010 through social media.